Osage vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,789,161 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 3.9 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $104,560, a difference of 18.3%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $87,769, a difference of 16.7%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $106,597, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $39,724, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $62,230, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 24.2%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.8%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 0.42%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.4%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 24.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 6.9%).