Immigrants from Lithuania vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,945,273 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 31.7 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $39,870, a difference of 28.8%), median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $51,473, a difference of 23.1%), and median family income ($118,053 compared to $97,288, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $52,365, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $38,528, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $57,919, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 52.4%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.44%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.6%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 46.0%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 41.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.2%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.35, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 98.1%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 57.1%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.5%).