Immigrants from Chile vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,677,491 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.055% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 54.6 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $39,870, a difference of 15.9%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $51,473, a difference of 8.7%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $97,288, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $52,365, a difference of 0.14%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $38,528, a difference of 4.7%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $83,395, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.67%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.8%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.7%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 53.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 48.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.1%).