Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from France Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,015,149 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from France. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 3.2 Immigrants from France.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $54,557, a difference of 60.8%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $120,076, a difference of 43.6%), and median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $63,715, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $53,805, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $66,826, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 61.3%), receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 50.5%), and family poverty (12.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.69%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.9%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 46.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 59.6%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 59.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 39.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 159.0%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 157.2%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 117.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 26.1%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.2%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.1%).