Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Honduras Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,797,649 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Honduras. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 11.6 Immigrants from Honduras.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $36,665, a difference of 8.1%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $48,267, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($83,639 compared to $83,618, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $51,888, a difference of 1.8%), and median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $45,787, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.6%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 0.84%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and single mother poverty (34.0% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.4% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 11.6%), family households with children (31.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.52 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.8%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 48.7%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 44.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 30.5%), master's degree (9.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 26.3%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.53%), disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.77%).