Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Panama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,940,194 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Immigrants from Panama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 42.8 Immigrants from Panama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $41,853, a difference of 11.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $89,451, a difference of 11.1%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $51,962, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,278, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and median family income ($90,345 compared to $95,647, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 22.2%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.81%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.1%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.46%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and family households (64.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 45.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 32.5%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.23%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.0%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%).