Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,432,855 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.919. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 62.0 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $55,082, a difference of 47.0%), median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $66,125, a difference of 40.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $112,575, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $54,830, a difference of 8.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $69,703, a difference of 14.3%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 40.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.3%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.15, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.2%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 114.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 114.6%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 92.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.6%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.0%).