Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,945,388 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,065 compared to $33,279, a difference of 14.4%), median household income ($76,784 compared to $67,879, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,914 compared to $75,647, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $52,081, a difference of 0.010%), median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $44,775, a difference of 6.0%), and median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $33,806, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 56.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 42.1%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.18%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 60.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 60.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.6%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.88%), family households (67.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (43.7% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.31%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 68.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 57.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 10.0%).