Immigrants vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,226,703 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.506. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 8.6 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,010 compared to $33,279, a difference of 29.2%), median household income ($85,818 compared to $67,879, a difference of 26.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $79,816, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $47,704, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $52,081, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 55.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 44.7%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 11.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 48.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 31.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.45, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.25%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.6%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 47.4%), and bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.30%), 11th grade (89.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and 12th grade, no diploma (88.2% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.4%).