Immigrants from Norway vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,285,533 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.604% in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 1,604.3 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $65,329, a difference of 28.1%), per capita income ($52,217 compared to $45,195, a difference of 15.5%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,669 compared to $110,201, a difference of 1.3%), median household income ($94,846 compared to $91,991, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $64,108, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 55.9%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 43.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 36.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 63.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.2%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.9%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.52%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.0%), male disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.3%).