Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,659,302 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.153% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 153.5 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $45,066, a difference of 15.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $97,185, a difference of 9.7%), and median male earnings ($61,628 compared to $57,145, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $51,370, a difference of 0.76%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $40,977, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.58%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.32%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.20%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%).