Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Haiti Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,846,571 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Haiti within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Immigrants from Haiti. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 23.7 Immigrants from Haiti.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 33.5%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $84,018, a difference of 26.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $51,219, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $50,398, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $36,203, a difference of 11.3%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $40,550, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 60.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 41.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 3.7%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 33.7%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.39, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 69.6%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 58.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 43.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 52.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.5%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.12%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).