Immigrants from Oceania vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,853,363 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.133% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 132.7 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $29,031, a difference of 55.8%), median household income ($89,100 compared to $59,159, a difference of 50.6%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $70,989, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 14.7%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $33,046, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $42,380, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 136.0%), family poverty (8.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 115.2%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 104.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 40.2%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 53.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 53.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 95.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 95.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 91.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 68.4%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.59%), family households (64.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.47%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 59.0%), bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 58.2%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 45.6%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.8%).