Immigrants from Uruguay vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,838,953 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.890. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.013% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 2,012.6 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $65,854, a difference of 15.6%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $110,011, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $106,849, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.0%), per capita income ($43,997 compared to $45,804, a difference of 4.1%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $40,798, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 40.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.1%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 18.2%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.92%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.9%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.9%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.1%).