Creek vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,214,859 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 64.4 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $106,849, a difference of 35.3%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $90,618, a difference of 33.8%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $110,011, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,259, a difference of 13.0%), and median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $56,302, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 64.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 59.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 30.9%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.020%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 68.8%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 68.6%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 61.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.8%).