Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Bahamas Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,060,389 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Bahamas. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Immigrants from Bahamas.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $76,910, a difference of 55.4%), median family income ($125,312 compared to $84,732, a difference of 47.9%), and median household income ($105,262 compared to $71,349, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 25.6%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $45,793, a difference of 27.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $53,174, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 68.6%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 63.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 9.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 52.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 58.8%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 56.4%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.75%), family households (65.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 42.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 93.1%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 72.3%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 33.2%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.9%).