Jordanian vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,495,816 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.224% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to a decrease of 223.8 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $119,496, a difference of 20.5%), per capita income ($45,605 compared to $53,874, a difference of 18.1%), and median household income ($91,794 compared to $105,262, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $70,238, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $122,343, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 16.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.33%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.0%), currently married (48.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 64.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.2%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.2% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.1%).