Iroquois vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,827,299 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 30.1 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $119,496, a difference of 42.8%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $105,262, a difference of 41.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $122,343, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $58,239, a difference of 22.9%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $46,481, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 56.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 25.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 51.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.7%), family households (62.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.47%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 82.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 76.5%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.31%), high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 62.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 50.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.9%).