New Zealander vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,611,443 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.508% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 507.9 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $46,876, a difference of 7.9%), householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $62,645, a difference of 7.5%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $108,691, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $52,190, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $41,375, a difference of 2.6%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $49,389, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.1%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.3%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.9%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 11.5%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.56%), currently married (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.4%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.50%).