New Zealander vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,302,227 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 81.1 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $39,194, a difference of 29.0%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $95,230, a difference of 21.0%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $50,772, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $51,615, a difference of 3.3%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $37,298, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.38%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.0%), currently married (47.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 75.5%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 72.1%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.6%).