Polish vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,664,658 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Polish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.444. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Poles within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Poles corresponds to an increase of 8.1 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Polish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,123 compared to $38,120, a difference of 21.0%), median male earnings ($58,139 compared to $48,254, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,952 compared to $88,115, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,407 compared to $49,364, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,598 compared to $56,339, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Polish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.6%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 6.8%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Polish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 33.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Polish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Polish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.6%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Polish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 22.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.82%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Polish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Polish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and male disability (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.1%).