Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Hmong

Poor
Average
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,327,835 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 31.1 Hmong.
Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.2%), median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $35,498, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $49,364, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $56,339, a difference of 1.7%), median family income ($94,665 compared to $91,296, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $88,115, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHmong
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,709
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,665
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,722
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,642
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,910
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,714
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,448
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$92,208
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,394
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 50.4%), receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 45.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 0.37%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and single female poverty (22.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHmong
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.9%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 51.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 48.2%), and female unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHmong
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 28.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.69%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.4%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.21, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHmong
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.1%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 148.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 79.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 20.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 49.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 67.6%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHmong
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
25.8%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
74.3%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.5%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (56.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHmong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.5%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 42.9%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.5%), and disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.34%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshHmong
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%