Portuguese vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 405,832,791 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $51,421, a difference of 5.9%), and median household income ($88,976 compared to $86,164, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $56,546, a difference of 0.21%), householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $61,244, a difference of 0.32%), and median family income ($106,286 compared to $105,839, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 32.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.28%), single female poverty (20.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.8%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.0%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.34%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (65.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.76%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.1%).