Burmese vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,324,364 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 21.6 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $86,164, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $96,525, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $103,507, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $51,421, a difference of 6.6%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $38,992, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 17.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.2%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 26.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 15.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.8% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 0.76%), currently married (48.9% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (65.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 40.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.6%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.57%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.7%).