Slovak vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,739,592 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to an increase of 12.3 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 49.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,029 compared to $91,347, a difference of 10.6%), and median family income ($103,729 compared to $93,988, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,095 compared to $45,729, a difference of 3.0%), median household income ($83,798 compared to $80,373, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($39,029 compared to $40,895, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 58.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.0%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 41.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.7%), married-couple households (47.6% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 198.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 53.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 19.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 44.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 96.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 50.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 44.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.10%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.9%).