Mongolian vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,137,201 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to a decrease of 16.5 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 37.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $91,347, a difference of 22.2%), and median family income ($114,553 compared to $93,988, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $52,437, a difference of 0.20%), median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $40,895, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($51,038 compared to $45,729, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 51.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.8%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 36.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 32.2%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.4%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 30.0%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 87.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 41.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 13.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 35.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 87.0%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 57.8%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.1%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.8%).