South American Indian vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,653,646 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 42.1 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 34.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,171 compared to $90,186, a difference of 12.2%), and median family income ($103,624 compared to $92,513, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $40,773, a difference of 1.9%), median earnings ($46,952 compared to $45,204, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $55,726, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 42.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 41.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 31.8%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 31.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.6%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.40, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 144.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 84.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 24.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 53.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 69.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 48.0%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 39.5%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.94%), 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 27.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.10%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.1%).