Comanche vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,523,406 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.300% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 299.9 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 36.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $55,726, a difference of 17.3%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $40,773, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $56,495, a difference of 2.9%), median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $50,321, a difference of 4.4%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $92,513, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 27.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 38.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.6%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.40, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 187.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 99.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 86.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 27.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 61.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 86.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 70.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 51.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 9.8%).