Tsimshian vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Laotians
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,400,062 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 90.3 Laotians.
Tsimshian vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $59,351, a difference of 21.5%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $47,041, a difference of 16.6%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $50,343, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $54,369, a difference of 0.51%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $42,133, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $104,993, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Poor 26.4% |
Tsimshian vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 57.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.080%), single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.80%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Tsimshian vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 163.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 79.3%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Tsimshian vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Good 82.9% |
Tsimshian vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 48.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.29%), currently married (47.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.74%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Tsimshian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Tsimshian vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 64.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 64.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Tsimshian vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 96.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 65.4%), and hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.7%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |