Iroquois vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,661,904 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 13.9 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $94,990, a difference of 27.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $111,051, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $104,993, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,369, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $42,133, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 49.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 43.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.2%), family households (62.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.4%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.9%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 41.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 34.7%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.6%).