Alsatian vs Immigrants from Latin America Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alsatian
Immigrants from Latin America
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alsatians
Immigrants from Latin America
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Immigrants from Latin America Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,981 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,117,601 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.47%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alsatian | Immigrants from Latin America |
Minimum | 0.97% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 29.2% | 13.5% |
Range | 28.2% | 11.1% |
Mean | 7.7% | 6.2% |
Median | 6.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 0.86% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Immigrants from Latin America by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |