Japanese vs Immigrants from Latin America Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from Latin America
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from Latin America
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from Latin America Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,117,601 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.13%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from Latin America |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 18.5% | 13.5% |
| Range | 17.6% | 11.1% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 6.2% |
| Median | 6.5% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 0.86% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from Latin America by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |