Brazilian vs Bhutanese Male Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
Bhutanese
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Bhutanese
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
85.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Bhutanese Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,937,131 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,462,899 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.22%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 4.9% | 4.8% |
Maximum | 30.6% | 33.3% |
Range | 25.7% | 28.5% |
Mean | 12.0% | 12.6% |
Median | 11.0% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 13.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Bhutanese by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |