Eastern European vs Bhutanese Male Disability
COMPARE
Eastern European
Bhutanese
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Eastern Europeans
Bhutanese
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Eastern European vs Bhutanese Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,169,070 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,462,899 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.94%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Eastern European | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.2% | 4.8% |
Maximum | 63.9% | 33.3% |
Range | 62.7% | 28.5% |
Mean | 15.5% | 12.6% |
Median | 10.1% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 13.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans and Bhutanese by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |