Choctaw vs Central American Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Choctaw
Central American
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Choctaw
Central Americans
16.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
59.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Central American Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,605,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,944,688 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 46.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Central American |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 21.3% |
| Range | 47.8% | 19.5% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 10.2% |
| Median | 25.6% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.5% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.9% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 1.7%), Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 1.9%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and Creek (16.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Haitian (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (11.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Italian (11.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Austrian (11.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 70.1 /100 | #161 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.6 /100 | #163 | Good 11.1% |
| Pakistanis | 65.8 /100 | #164 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 63.8 /100 | #166 | Good 11.1% |
| Austrians | 63.2 /100 | #167 | Good 11.1% |
| Central Americans | 59.1 /100 | #168 | Average 11.2% |
| Haitians | 59.0 /100 | #169 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 58.0 /100 | #170 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 55.9 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Italians | 55.6 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
| Lebanese | 51.8 /100 | #173 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.3% |
| Czechs | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 11.3% |