Choctaw vs Swiss Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Choctaw
Swiss
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Choctaw
Swiss
16.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
18.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Swiss Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,605,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,639,334 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 41.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Swiss |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 34.6% |
| Range | 47.8% | 33.2% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 13.0% |
| Median | 25.6% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.5% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.9% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 6.3% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 1.7%), Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 1.9%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and Creek (16.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Basque (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kenya (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Guatemala (11.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Panama (11.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and British (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Africa | 29.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 27.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 11.5% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 25.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 11.5% |
| Iraqis | 24.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 21.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 20.4 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.6% |
| Basques | 19.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 11.6% |
| Swiss | 18.7 /100 | #200 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 17.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 17.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.6% |
| British | 17.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.6% |
| Nigerians | 16.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.6% |
| Slavs | 15.5 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 14.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.7% |
| Ghanaians | 14.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.7% |