Creek vs Filipino Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Creek
Filipino
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Creek
Filipinos
16.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Filipino Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,427,541 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.615 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,159,243 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 109.8%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Filipino |
| Minimum | 9.2% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 56.7% | 18.4% |
| Range | 47.4% | 17.2% |
| Mean | 24.6% | 6.6% |
| Median | 22.7% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.4% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.5% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Creek by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.86%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Hong Kong (8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Taiwan (7.8%, a difference of 2.5%), Immigrants from India (8.3%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Iran (8.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and Thai (8.6%, a difference of 6.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 8.9% |