Creek vs White/Caucasian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Creek
White/Caucasian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Creek
Whites/Caucasians
16.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs White/Caucasian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,427,541 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.615 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,010,909 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.455 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 33.8%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 9.2% | 10.1% |
| Maximum | 56.7% | 19.8% |
| Range | 47.4% | 9.7% |
| Mean | 24.6% | 13.4% |
| Median | 22.7% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.4% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.5% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 1.8% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Creek by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.86%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Subsaharan African (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Dominica (12.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Spanish (12.7%, a difference of 0.44%), French (12.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and Marshallese (12.5%, a difference of 0.71%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| English | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.4% |
| German Russians | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Malaysians | 0.5 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Senegalese | 0.5 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.4 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.4 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Marshallese | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 12.7% |
| French | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Nepalese | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 12.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 12.8% |