Immigrants from Africa vs Central American Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Central American
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Central Americans
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
92.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Central American Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,296,283 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,432,725 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.466 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.58%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Central American |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 26.3% | 16.7% |
| Range | 23.9% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 9.3% |
| Median | 10.4% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Central Americans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Ghanaian (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |