Immigrants from Africa vs Ghanaian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Ghanaian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Ghanaians
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Ghanaian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,296,283 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,687,278 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.73%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 26.3% | 25.9% |
Range | 23.9% | 24.5% |
Mean | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Median | 10.4% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 11.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Ghanaians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Uganda (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Syria | 94.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |