Immigrants from Australia vs Slavic Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Slavic
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Slavs
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Slavic Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,835,227 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.4%, a difference of 16.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Slavic |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 0.96% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 15.4% |
| Range | 21.0% | 14.4% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Median | 3.6% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.1% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Polish (3.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Hmong (3.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Yaqui (3.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and Northern European (3.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Lithuanians | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Austrians | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Italians | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Yuman | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Hungarians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Croatians | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Slavs | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Poles | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |