Immigrants from Australia vs Ugandan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Ugandan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Ugandans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Ugandan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,015,951 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 0.45% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 9.4% |
| Range | 21.0% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 3.5% |
| Median | 3.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |