Immigrants from Bolivia vs Chinese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Chinese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Chinese
16.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Chinese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,730,419 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 16.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Chinese |
Minimum | 6.8% | 10.5% |
Maximum | 26.0% | 30.0% |
Range | 19.2% | 19.5% |
Mean | 15.1% | 16.3% |
Median | 15.1% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.5% | 17.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Chinese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Immigrants from Northern Europe (16.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Bulgarian (16.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (16.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Eastern European (16.3%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Eastern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 16.3% |