Zimbabwean vs Chinese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chinese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chinese
17.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
6.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Chinese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,204,510 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 10.6%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
| Minimum | 7.2% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 30.0% |
| Range | 23.7% | 19.5% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 16.3% |
| Median | 17.1% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Moroccan (17.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Icelander (17.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Salvadoran (17.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Okinawan (17.6%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Hawaiians | 7.2 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 7.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 6.9 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Okinawans | 6.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Salvadorans | 6.7 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Icelanders | 6.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 6.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Moroccans | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Central Americans | 4.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Alsatians | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Fijians | 3.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Vietnamese | 3.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Marshallese | 2.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 2.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 17.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |