Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Lithuania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Lithuania
2.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,804,939 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 11.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Minimum | 0.45% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 5.7% | 5.7% |
Range | 5.2% | 3.5% |
Mean | 2.6% | 3.3% |
Median | 2.5% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 3.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.49% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.87% | 0.86% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.86% | 0.85% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Haitian (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Jamaica (2.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Western Africa (2.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Okinawan (2.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (2.6%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Salvadorans | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Haitians | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.6% |
West Indians | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Senegalese | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Nigerians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Venezuelans | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |