South American vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
South American
Immigrants from Lithuania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
South Americans
Immigrants from Lithuania
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,776,851 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.379 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 9.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Minimum | 0.40% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 5.7% |
Range | 6.0% | 3.5% |
Mean | 2.4% | 3.3% |
Median | 2.4% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 3.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.75% | 0.86% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.75% | 0.85% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Ethiopian (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Jamaican (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Paraguayans | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |