Immigrants from Uruguay vs Choctaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Choctaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Choctaw
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Choctaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,255,356 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,636,195 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 41.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 12.7% | 30.3% |
| Range | 9.2% | 25.8% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 13.7% |
| Median | 6.2% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (8.2%, a difference of 0.83%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |