Serbian vs Choctaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Serbian
Choctaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Serbians
Choctaw
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
42.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Choctaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,596,356 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,636,195 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 35.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 24.6% | 30.3% |
| Range | 23.2% | 25.8% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 13.7% |
| Median | 7.1% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Serbians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (8.2%, a difference of 0.83%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |