Lumbee vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Lumbee
Chinese
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Lumbee
Chinese
17.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,257,534 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 71.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Chinese |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 48.5% | 33.9% |
| Range | 44.2% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 22.1% | 12.1% |
| Median | 21.6% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 4.2%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 4.5%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |