Seminole vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Seminole
Chinese
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Seminole
Chinese
15.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,297,769 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.333 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 54.0%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Seminole | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.3% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 53.7% | 33.9% |
Range | 50.5% | 29.7% |
Mean | 22.3% | 12.1% |
Median | 22.5% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.7% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Seminole by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Colville (15.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Yuman (15.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and Alaskan Athabascan (15.7%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |